Tech Horizons Project Guide
Computer Science • Independent Career Research Project
Tech Horizons Project Guide
Two-Day CS Career Exploration & Comparative Analysis (2 × 45-Minute Sessions)
Student:
Period:
Mission Objective
Investigate two distinct careers in computing. Build comprehensive research profiles for both roles, then conduct a critical comparative fit analysis directly within your assigned Google Doc template.
Day 1 (45m) Select Tracks & Career #1
Day 2 (45m) Career #2 & Comparative Fit
1
Select Your Two Target Careers
Select from same track or cross-compare two different tracks
Creative Technology
Video Game Developer UX/UI Architect Front-End Engineer Digital Media Dev
Emerging Technologies
Machine Learning Engineer Robotics Programmer Cloud Architect Quantum CS Researcher
Broad CS & Infrastructure
Cybersecurity Analyst Data Scientist / Analyst Software Engineer Computer Hardware Dev
Student Choice (Custom Specialization)
Bioinformatics Engineer FinTech Quant Developer HealthTech CS Specialist Self-Proposed Role
2 Google Doc Setup & Formatting Requirements
Doc Title: [Last Name] - CS Career Dossier - P[#]
• Typography: 11pt Arial or Inter, 1.15 line spacing.
• Heading Structure: H1 for Careers & Synthesis, H2 for Pillars.
• Access Settings: Share as "Anyone with link can comment."
3
Career Profile Blueprint (Complete for Both Career #1 and Career #2)
5 Guided Pillars per Role
01. Duties & Day-in-the-Life Heading 2
Define the primary purpose of the role. Detail at least 4 specific daily tasks, typical project lifecycles, and work setting (remote, on-site lab, collaborative scrum).
02. Technical & Soft Skills Heading 2
Identify at least 3 programming languages / toolsets (e.g., Python, C++, Figma, Docker), 2 development methods, and 3 critical workplace soft skills.
03. Education & Entry Pathways Heading 2
State degree requirements (BS, MS, or alternative portfolio/bootcamp pathways), relevant college majors, and 2 recognized industry certifications (CompTIA, AWS, Cisco).
04. Compensation & Salary Tiers Heading 2
Document 3 verified salary benchmarks: Entry-Level (10th-25th percentile), National Median, and Senior Tier. Note geographical variations.
05. 10-Yr Job Outlook Heading 2
Cite projected percentage growth rate from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) or equivalent industry body.
Future Demand Drivers:
Explain 2 technological or economic catalysts driving future demand (or automation risks) for this role over the next decade.
Tech Horizons CS Research Dossier • Page 1 of 2 Turn over for Part 2: Comparison Guide & Rubric →
Part 2 • Synthesis & Evaluative Comparison
Career Comparison & Personal Fit Analysis
Day 2 Core Milestone
4
Comparative Synthesis Instructions (In Google Doc)
Section A: Side-by-Side Comparison Matrix Insert 3-Column Table in Google Doc
Create a table with columns [Evaluation Criteria] | [Career #1 Name] | [Career #2 Name] containing 5 concise comparative rows:
1. Primary Focus
2. Key Tech Stack
3. Education Path
4. Median Salary
5. Growth Rate
Section B: Analytical Reflection Responses 5-7 Complete Sentences Per Prompt
1. Technical Commonalities
What shared computational thinking, algorithmic logic, or collaborative workflows connect both roles? How could skills in Career #1 transfer to #2?
2. Daily Divergences
How do daily work realities contrast? Contrast work pacing, cognitive pressure points, physical settings, and solitary coding vs. team collaboration.
3. Personal Fit & Choice
Which path better fits your personal strengths, creative goals, and lifestyle? What is one actionable high school step you could take to explore it further?
5
Approved Research Databases & Sourcing Guidelines
BLS Handbook bls.gov/ooh
Authoritative national salary tables and 10-year job outlook forecasts.
O*NET OnLine onetonline.org
Granular day-to-day work tasks, software knowledge, and work styles.
CompTIA & IEEE comptia.org • ieee.org
Emerging technology roadmaps and industry certification matrices.
Levels.fyi levels.fyi
Real-world compensation tiers, bonuses, and title leveling across tech firms.
* Requirement: Cite at least 2 credible database sources per career profile at the bottom of your Google Doc (Title + URL + retrieval date).
6
Evaluation Rubric (100 Points Total)
Self-assess before sharing
| Component | Weight | Proficient Standard |
|---|
| Profiles #1 & #2 | 40 pts | All 5 guided pillars thoroughly detailed for both roles with specific tools, BLS figures, and degree paths. |
| Comparative Analysis | 30 pts | Comparison table complete; all 3 reflection prompts answer technical similarities, divergences, and personal fit. |
| Credibility & Sources | 15 pts | At least 4 credible sources cited across the document (BLS, O*NET, IEEE); data points are accurate. |
| Doc Formatting | 15 pts | Follows required naming convention, clear H1/H2 hierarchy, clean typography, and valid share permissions. |
Submission Pre-Flight:
• Sharing set to "Anyone with link can comment" • Both profiles filled • 3 reflections written • 4+ sources cited
Tech Horizons CS Research Dossier • Page 2 of 2 Computer Science Department • Research Instructions