Space Debate Annotation Guide Text 1 Companion Guía de Anotaciones y Preguntas
Humans Need to Explore Outer Space
Argument by Claudia Alarcón • Reading & Analysis Guide
Name:
Date: Period:
Annotation Key (Clave):
★ Claim / Tesis 🔍 Fact / Dato ⚡ Risk / Riesgo 💡 Gain / Beneficio
Bilingual Cognates (Cognados Clave):
English ≈ Español
priority
(prioridad)
High importance
colonization
(colonización)
Settling new area
at stake
(en juego / riesgo)
In grave danger
Q1
Targeted Passage (p. 2, ¶3) • Commercial Space Flight & Risk
Mark: ⚡ and ★
What tragedies in space history does Alarcón cite, and why does she believe private "New Space" companies can boost discovery despite these dangers?
Apoyo en español: ¿Qué tragedias cita Alarcón y por qué cree que las empresas privadas impulsarán nuevos descubrimientos?
Sentence Starter (Marco de Oración):
"Although space travel had tragic losses like ________, Alarcón argues private companies will boost discovery because ________."
Q2
Space Mining & Off-Earth Resources (p. 3)
Mark: 💡
How could mining asteroid ice help deep-space rockets, and what resources on the Moon (like helium-3 and rare metals) could help human growth on Earth?
Apoyo en español: ¿Cómo ayudaría el hielo de asteroides a las misiones espaciales y qué recursos lunares beneficiarían a la Tierra?
Sentence Starter (Marco de Oración):
"Mining asteroid ice can make space missions cheaper by ________, while lunar minerals like helium-3 can support Earth by ________."
Q3
Targeted Passage (p. 4, ¶11) • Humanity at Stake & Mars Settlement
Mark: ★
Why does Alarcón claim that the human race is "at stake"? Why does she compare colonizing Mars to climbing Mount Everest?
Apoyo en español: ¿Por qué dice la autora que la humanidad está en riesgo y por qué compara colonizar Marte con escalar el monte Everest?
Sentence Starter (Marco de Oración):
"Alarcón asserts that humanity is at stake because Earth is ________. She compares Mars to Mount Everest to show that while colonizing is risky, it is ________."
Annotation Reflection: Did you mark NASA's robotic milestones (Hubble, Cassini, Juno) on pages 2-3 of the text?
Page 1 of 3
Text 2 Companion Guía de Anotaciones y Preguntas
Let Robots Take to the Stars
Argument based on Eiren Caffall • Reading & Analysis Guide
Name:
Date: Period:
Annotation Key (Clave):
💰 Cost / Gasto 🌍 Earth / Ambiente 🤖 Robot / Ventaja ⚠️ Danger / Peligro
Bilingual Cognates (Cognados Clave):
English ≈ Español
profits
(ganancias)
Business earnings
radiation
(radiación)
Cell-damaging rays
accomplish
(lograr / cumplir)
Carry out goals
Q1
Targeted Passage (p. 2, ¶3) • High Cost & Commercialization
Mark: 💰 and ⚠️
Why does Caffall criticize private companies headed by "dreamers and people interested in profits"? What is her fear regarding "reality television" funding?
Apoyo en español: ¿Por qué critica la autora a las empresas privadas y qué teme respecto a financiar misiones espaciales como "telerrealidad"?
Sentence Starter (Marco de Oración):
"Caffall warns that private companies focus on ________ over practicality, and relying on commercial ads risks turning science into ________."
Q2
Rocket Black Carbon & The "Planet B" Myth (pp. 2-3)
Mark: 🌍
How do rocket exhausts harm Earth's outer atmosphere, and why does Caffall reject the idea of abandoning Earth to find a "Planet B"?
Apoyo en español: ¿Cómo daña el hollín de los cohetes a la atmósfera y por qué rechaza Caffall la idea de abandonar la Tierra en busca de un 'Planeta B'?
Sentence Starter (Marco de Oración):
"Rocket emissions trap harmful black carbon soot in the atmosphere for ________. Caffall rejects 'Planet B' because humanity must use resources to ________."
Q3
Targeted Passage (p. 4, ¶10) • Radiation & Superiority of Robots
Mark: 🤖 and ⚠️
What biological risks (such as radiation cancer hazards and food/gas imbalances) endanger astronauts, and why will robots replace humans as better pilots and researchers?
Apoyo en español: ¿Qué riesgos biológicos amenazan a los astronautas y por qué sostiene la autora que los robots son mejores investigadores?
Sentence Starter (Marco de Oración):
"Humans in deep space face severe health hazards like ________, whereas robotic missions like Curiosity and Opportunity can explore safely because ________."
Annotation Reflection: Did you locate Caffall's key data showing a human Mars mission would cost $1 trillion over 25 years?
Page 2 of 3
Paired Synthesis Batalla de Argumentos: Humanos vs. Robots
Human Crews vs. Robotic Explorers
Comparative Analysis • Alarcón (Pro-Human) vs. Caffall (Pro-Robot)
Name:
Date: Period:
Claudia Alarcón (Send Humans)
Eiren Caffall (Send Robots)
Main Claim (Tesis):
Humans must continue space exploration; Earth's survival and resources depend on establishing new settlements.
Key Evidence (Pruebas):
Apollo 11, ISS international unity (16 nations).
Mining Moon helium-3 & asteroid ice for fuel.
Earth is surpassing carrying capacity.
Danger Stance (Riesgos):
Risky like climbing Mount Everest, but private innovation will solve technical landing challenges.
Main Claim (Tesis):
Robots, not humans, should explore deep space; funding and global teamwork should heal Earth's pollution first.
Key Evidence (Pruebas):
Mars trip costs $1 trillion over 25 years.
Rocket black carbon soot stays in air 10 years.
Astronaut radiation risks & unproven "Planet B".
Robotic Advantage (Robots):
Hubble and rovers explore cheaply and efficiently without risking human lives on life-support.
Academic Debate Frames (Marcos para la Comparación y Síntesis):
Contrasting Arguments / Contrastar:
"While Alarcón argues space provides vital resources, Caffall counters that ________."
Weighing Evidence / Evaluar Pruebas:
"Caffall's data on radiation and cost is persuasive, yet Alarcón's warning on carrying capacity proves ________."
Synthesis
Final Evaluative Response • Tu Postura Argumentativa
Cite Both Authors
Whose argument presents a more convincing vision for the future of space exploration: Claudia Alarcón (send humans) or Eiren Caffall (send robots)? State your claim, explain your reasons, and cite specific evidence from both texts.
Apoyo en español: ¿Qué argumento es más convincente: Alarcón (humanos) o Caffall (robots)? Expresa tu tesis y cita evidencia de ambos textos.
Select a sentence frame to begin your response (Elige un marco de inicio):
A (Pro-Humans): "After evaluating both texts, I find Alarcón's position more persuasive because ________."
B (Pro-Robots): "Caffall presents a stronger argument because the evidence regarding ________ proves that humans should not ________."
C (Compromise): "Both authors offer valid points; however, the most realistic approach is ________ because ________."
Student Checklist: Clear Claim Text 1 Evidence Text 2 Evidence Sentence Frame
Page 3 of 3
Space Frontier Slides Paired Argument Debate • HMH Reading Unit
Bilingual English & Español
Space Frontier Debate
Humans Need Outer Space vs. Let Robots Take to the Stars
Essential Question • Pregunta Esencial
Should humanity invest in sending human astronauts or robotic probes to explore deep space?
¿Debería la humanidad invertir en enviar astronautas humanos o sondas robóticas para explorar el espacio?
Claudia Alarcón (Pro-Humans) vs. Eiren Caffall (Pro-Robots) Active Reading & Analysis Presentation
Reading Strategy
Active Annotation & Cognates Toolkit
Herramientas de Anotación y Cognados
Annotation Symbols (Símbolos)
★
Main Claim / Tesis Central
🔍
Key Evidence / Prueba Clave
⚡
Documented Risk / Riesgo o Peligro
💡
Future Benefit / Beneficio Futuro
Key Cognates (Cognados Clave)
priority ≈ prioridad
Top importance / Suma importancia
colonization ≈ colonización
Settling new lands / Asentamiento
radiation ≈ radiación
Cell-damaging rays / Energía dañina
Use these symbols as you read both texts in your guide. Guide Page 1 & 2
Text 1 Breakdown
Humans Need to Explore Outer Space
Claudia Alarcón
★ Core Claim (Tesis)
Humans must colonize space because Earth's carrying capacity is at risk, and our survival depends on expansion.
La supervivencia humana y la Tierra están en juego.
🔍 Resources & Energy
Asteroid ice supplies deep-space rocket fuel, and lunar helium-3 and rare metals provide clean energy for Earth.
Minería espacial de hielo y helio-3 para la Tierra.
⚡ Risk vs. Reward
Going to Mars is risky like climbing Mount Everest, but private "New Space" innovation will unlock historic solutions.
Como el monte Everest: arriesgado pero posible.
Discussion Frame (Marco de Discusión):
"According to Alarcón, human space exploration is necessary because ________."
Targeted Passages ¶3 & ¶11
Text 2 Breakdown
Let Robots Take to the Stars
Eiren Caffall
💰 Massive Cost ($1 Trillion)
Humans to Mars costs $1 trillion over 25 years. Private companies prioritize profits, risking turning science into reality TV.
Gasto desmedido y riesgo de comercialización frívola.
🌍 Atmospheric Harm
Rocket soot lingers for 10 years in the upper atmosphere. There is no "Planet B"—we must heal Earth rather than flee it.
El hollín contamina y no existe un "Planeta B".
🤖 Robotic Superiority
Astronauts face cancer-causing radiation and supply shortages. Rovers like Curiosity and Opportunity explore safely and cheaply.
Los robots exploran mejor sin arriesgar vidas.
Discussion Frame (Marco de Discusión):
"Caffall contends that robotic exploration is superior because ________."
Targeted Passages ¶3 & ¶10
Argument Face-Off
Comparing the Two Positions
Comparación Cara a Cara
Claudia Alarcón Pro-Humans
Primary Goal: Establish human settlements on the Moon and Mars.
Key Defense: Human presence unlocks creativity, resource mining, and survival.
View on Private Sector: Private "New Space" firms provide vital innovation and speed.
Eiren Caffall Pro-Robots
Primary Goal: Deploy robotic probes and focus trillions on healing Earth.
Key Defense: Robots are cheaper, immune to radiation, and don't need food.
View on Private Sector: Profit-driven dreamers lack accountability and risk commercialization.
Key Tension: Is space exploration an urgent necessity for human survival, or an expensive distraction from fixing Earth?
Partner Discourse
Turn & Talk: Academic Debate Frames
Marcos de Conversación Académica
1. Contrasting Perspectives (Contrastar Puntos de Vista) Frame A
"While Alarcón argues that human settlement is vital, Caffall counters that ________."
Mientras Alarcón argumenta que la colonización es vital, Caffall responde que...
2. Evaluating Evidence (Evaluar la Evidencia Más Sólida) Frame B
"I find Caffall's evidence regarding radiation and cost more convincing because ________."
Encuentro más convincente la evidencia de Caffall sobre la radiación y el costo porque...
3. Taking a Personal Stance (Expresar tu Postura Personal) Frame C
"Based on both texts, I believe future exploration should prioritize ________ because ________."
Basado en ambos textos, creo que la exploración futura debe priorizar... porque...
Turn to your partner and practice using these sentence frames. Discourse Protocol
Final Challenge
Synthesis Writing Mission
Page 3 of Guide
Your Evaluative Prompt • Tu Reto Escrito
Whose argument presents a more convincing vision for the future of space exploration: Claudia Alarcón (humans) or Eiren Caffall (robots)?
¿Qué argumento presenta una visión más convincente sobre el futuro de la exploración espacial? Defiende tu postura con evidencia de ambos textos.
Stance A: Pro-Humans
"I find Alarcón's position more persuasive because..."
Stance B: Pro-Robots
"Caffall presents a stronger argument because..."
Stance C: Compromise
"The most realistic approach is a balance where..."
Complete the synthesis response on Page 3 of your Student Guide. Cite evidence from both selections!
Space Debate Answer Key Teacher Key & Guide Clave del Maestro • Respuestas Modelo
Space Debate Answer Key: Text 1
Claudia Alarcón • Humans Need to Explore Outer Space
Exemplar Guide
Grade 6–8 Reading / ELA
Instructional Goal: Guide students to identify how Alarcón balances documented risks (shuttle disasters) with compelling benefits (survival, space mining).
Aligns to Guide Page 1
Q1 Model
Targeted Passage (p. 2, ¶3) • Commercial Flight & Risk
Target: Text Evidence
Question: What tragedies does Alarcón cite, and why does she believe private companies will boost discovery?
Exemplar Student Response (Completed Sentence Stem):
"Although space travel had tragic losses like the explosions of Challenger in 1986 and Columbia in 2003, Alarcón argues private companies will boost discovery because technological innovation and direct human involvement will overcome documented dangers and make ambitious goals like Mars colonization possible."
Key Evidence Look-For: Student correctly names Challenger or Columbia AND explains that private "New Space" firms bring technological innovation.
Q2 Model
Space Mining & Off-Earth Resources (p. 3)
Target: Dual Benefit
Question: How could asteroid ice and lunar mining benefit both space travel and Earth?
Exemplar Student Response (Completed Sentence Stem):
"Mining asteroid ice can make space missions cheaper by converting water ice into rocket fuel directly in space for farther launches, while lunar minerals like helium-3 can support Earth by developing clean energy and providing rare metals needed for electronics and solar panels."
Key Evidence Look-For: Mentions asteroid ice = fuel in space; lunar helium-3 or rare metals = energy / electronics on Earth.
Q3 Model
Targeted Passage (p. 4, ¶11) • Humanity at Stake
Target: Core Argument
Question: Why is the human race "at stake," and why compare Mars to Mount Everest?
Exemplar Student Response (Completed Sentence Stem):
"Alarcón asserts that humanity is at stake because Earth is close to surpassing its carrying capacity and exhausting natural resources. She compares Mars to Mount Everest to show that while colonizing is risky, it is a risky but not impossible proposition that human courage and science can achieve."
Key Evidence Look-For: Identifies carrying capacity / resource depletion AND interprets the metaphor (difficult but possible).
Teacher Tip for Spanish Speakers & Common Misconception:
Spanish Cognate Anchor: Highlight capacidad de carga (carrying capacity) and recursos naturales . Point out that Alarcón does not deny danger; she acknowledges risks upfront.
Common Misconception: Students often think Alarcón opposes robots. Clarify that she celebrates rovers (Hubble, Juno, Cassini) as preparation for human crews!
Space Frontier Debate • Teacher Facilitation Document Page 1 of 3
Teacher Key & Guide Clave del Maestro • Respuestas Modelo
Space Debate Answer Key: Text 2
Eiren Caffall • Let Robots Take to the Stars
Exemplar Guide
Grade 6–8 Reading / ELA
Instructional Goal: Guide students to analyze Caffall's counterarguments: astronomical financial waste ($1T), upper-atmosphere soot, and biological limitations.
Aligns to Guide Page 2
Q1 Model
Targeted Passage (p. 2, ¶3) • High Cost & Reality TV
Target: Author's Critique
Question: Why does Caffall criticize private space companies and warn against "reality TV" funding?
Exemplar Student Response (Completed Sentence Stem):
"Caffall warns that private companies focus on profits and commercial dreams over practicality, and relying on commercial ads risks turning science into a reality television spectacle run by corporate sponsors who lack government accountability."
Key Evidence Look-For: Mentions profits over practicality, lack of public accountability, and the loss of scientific integrity.
Q2 Model
Rocket Black Carbon & The "Planet B" Myth (pp. 2-3)
Target: Environmental Evidence
Question: How do rocket emissions damage the atmosphere, and why reject "Planet B"?
Exemplar Student Response (Completed Sentence Stem):
"Rocket emissions trap harmful black carbon soot in the atmosphere for up to ten years because there is no rain or wind to wash it away. Caffall rejects 'Planet B' because humanity must use resources to cooperate globally and solve pollution on Earth rather than treating space as an escape hatch."
Key Evidence Look-For: Names black carbon soot (10-year lifespan) AND articulates that running to "Planet B" abandons our responsibility to Earth.
Q3 Model
Targeted Passage (p. 4, ¶10) • Radiation & Robotic Superiority
Target: Biological Contrast
Question: What biological risks endanger astronauts, and why are robots better suited?
Exemplar Student Response (Completed Sentence Stem):
"Humans in deep space face severe health hazards like deadly cosmic radiation that increases cancer risk, food shortages, and plant oxygen imbalances, whereas robotic missions like Curiosity and Opportunity can explore safely because they do not require life support and replace humans as more efficient pilots and researchers."
Key Evidence Look-For: Cites Curiosity rover radiation findings or supply risks AND notes rovers carry out tasks without life support.
Teacher Tip for Spanish Speakers & Common Misconception:
Spanish Language Anchor: Clarify that "suborbital flight" (vuelo suborbital) and "geoengineering" (geoingeniería) are technical terms. Emphasize that Caffall loves science, but hates wasted taxpayer money.
Common Misconception: Students often assume Caffall wants to cancel NASA completely. Point out she cheers for rovers (Hubble, Pathfinder, Opportunity) and advocates robot-led science.
Space Frontier Debate • Teacher Facilitation Document Page 2 of 3
Synthesis Key & Rubric Rúbrica y Respuestas de Síntesis
Comparative Synthesis & Scoring Rubric
Evaluating Dual-Text Arguments • Alarcón vs. Caffall
Assessment Guide
Aligns to Guide Page 3
Synthesis Objective: Students must take a clear argumentative stance and integrate evidence from both texts (not just the one they agree with).
Model Response A: Pro-Human Crew (Option A) Full Score (4/4)
"After evaluating both texts, I find Claudia Alarcón's position more persuasive because Earth is approaching its carrying capacity and exhausting vital resources. While Caffall rightly points out that a Mars mission costs $1 trillion and creates rocket soot, Alarcón proves that space mining can actually provide Helium-3 for clean energy and asteroid ice for fuel. Human survival requires establishing a new home, and partnering with private companies will turn dangerous journeys into historic achievements, just like climbing Mount Everest."
Model Response B: Pro-Robotic Probes (Option B) Full Score (4/4)
"Caffall presents a stronger argument because the evidence regarding cancer-causing radiation, black carbon soot lingering for ten years, and the $1 trillion price tag proves that humans should not waste resources pursuing an illusion of 'Planet B'. Although Alarcón claims that human settlement will secure new resources, Caffall demonstrates that robotic rovers like Opportunity accomplish research far more cheaply without risking human lives or turning serious science into a commercial reality show."
4-Point Holistic Scoring Rubric • Rúbrica de Evaluación
Standards: RL/RI.1, RI.8, W.1
4 - Exemplary
States clear claim using sentence frame; accurately cites strong evidence from both texts ; explains reasoning with nuanced contrast.
3 - Proficient
States clear claim; cites evidence from both texts, though one text may be less developed; completes sentence stem logically.
2 - Developing
States claim; cites evidence from only one text or relies on vague generalizations; sentence stem partially completed.
1 - Beginning
Unclear claim; minimal or inaccurate text evidence; incomplete response requiring heavy teacher prompting.
Classroom Debate Facilitation Tip:
Conduct a "Four Corners" or "Philosophical Chairs" activity where students move to sides of the room based on whether they agree with Alarcón (Corner A: Human Missions) or Caffall (Corner B: Robot Missions). Have students use their completed Page 3 frames during the debate!
Space Frontier Debate • Teacher Facilitation Document Page 3 of 3
Space Debate Flashcards Simplified Vocabulary • Set 1 Tarjetas de Vocabulario Fácil
Space Debate Flashcards: Text 1
Claudia Alarcón • "Humans Need to Explore Outer Space"
Cut & Study Cards
Simple Words & Spanish Cognates
Cut along dashed lines (Corta sobre las líneas punteadas)
Cards 1–6: Text 1 Words
priority noun
prioridad
Simple Meaning: Great importance; what comes first.
En español: Gran importancia; lo que va primero.
In Text: "...putting priority on commercial space flight." (p. 2)
Sentence Stem: "My top priority today is ________."
colonization noun
colonización
Simple Meaning: Settling and living in a new place as outsiders.
En español: Establecerse y vivir en un lugar nuevo.
In Text: "...goals range from trips to the colonization of Mars." (p. 2)
Sentence Stem: "Colonization of the Moon means humans will ________."
at stake idiom
en peligro / riesgo
Simple Meaning: At risk, or in danger of being lost.
En español: En peligro de perderse; en riesgo.
In Text: "...the future of the human race and Earth is at stake." (p. 4)
Sentence Stem: "Earth's nature is at stake when we ________."
proposition noun
propuesta / tarea
Simple Meaning: A big task, challenge, or plan.
En español: Una gran tarea, plan o reto difícil.
In Text: "This is a risky, but not impossible, proposition." (p. 4)
Sentence Stem: "Going to Mars is a tough proposition because ________."
surpassing verb
sobrepasar
Simple Meaning: Going beyond a limit or capacity.
En español: Ir más allá del límite o capacidad.
In Text: "We are close to surpassing our planet's carrying capacity..." (p. 4)
Sentence Stem: "Humans are surpassing Earth's limits by ________."
space mining noun
minería espacial
Simple Meaning: Collecting water ice and metals from asteroids or the Moon.
En español: Sacar hielo y metales de la Luna o asteroides.
In Text: "Mining on the moon could uncover rare metals." (p. 3)
Sentence Stem: "Space mining can give humans new ________."
Practice reading each word and simple meaning aloud with your partner!
Page 1 of 2
Simplified Vocabulary • Set 2 Tarjetas de Vocabulario Fácil
Space Debate Flashcards: Text 2
Eiren Caffall • "Let Robots Take to the Stars"
Cut & Study Cards
Simple Words & Spanish Cognates
Cut along dashed lines (Corta sobre las líneas punteadas)
Cards 7–12: Text 2 Words
private adjective
privado
Simple Meaning: Run by a company, not by the government.
En español: Manejado por una empresa, no por el gobierno.
In Text: "...made up of private companies headed by dreamers." (p. 2)
Sentence Stem: "A private space company is different from NASA because ________."
profits noun
ganancias
Simple Meaning: The money a business makes.
En español: El dinero que gana un negocio o empresa.
In Text: "...people interested in profits over practicality." (p. 2)
Sentence Stem: "Companies seek profits so they can ________."
reality TV noun
telerrealidad
Simple Meaning: Shows about real people without scripts.
En español: Programas de televisión con personas reales, no actores.
In Text: "...turn a scientific mission into a reality television show." (p. 2)
Sentence Stem: "Turning space into reality TV is bad because ________."
soot / black carbon noun
hollín negro
Simple Meaning: Dark dirty smoke left in the air by rockets.
En español: Humo negro contaminante que expulsan los cohetes.
In Text: "...black carbon, or soot from the fumes from a rocket engine." (p. 2)
Sentence Stem: "Rocket soot harms Earth because it stays for ________."
radiation noun
radiación
Simple Meaning: Energy in space that damages people's bodies.
En español: Energía invisible en el espacio que daña el cuerpo.
In Text: "...radiation greatly increases a person's risk of getting cancer." (p. 3)
Sentence Stem: "Radiation makes space dangerous for humans because ________."
accomplish verb
lograr / cumplir
Simple Meaning: To carry out or finish a task successfully.
En español: Completar o realizar una tarea con éxito.
In Text: "...say that robots can't accomplish space travel as cheaply..." (p. 4)
Sentence Stem: "Robots can accomplish space missions because they don't need ________."
Use these cards to test each other on words before writing your debate responses!
Page 2 of 2
Space Debate Graphic Organizer Graphic Organizer Organizador Gráfico de Argumentos
Space Debate Argument Map
Claudia Alarcón (Pro-Humans) vs. Eiren Caffall (Pro-Robots)
Name:
Date: Period:
Core Debate Question: Should future space exploration prioritize human crews or robotic probes?
Pregunta Central: ¿Debería la exploración espacial priorizar tripulaciones humanas o sondas robóticas?
Claudia Alarcón
Pro-Humans
1. Author's Main Claim (Tesis Principal):
2. Evidence: Earth & Resources (Prueba: Supervivencia):
3. Evidence: Innovation & Space Mining (Minería e Innovación):
4. Risk Addressed: Mt. Everest Analogy (Riesgo Justificado):
Eiren Caffall
Pro-Robots
1. Author's Main Claim (Tesis Principal):
2. Evidence: $1T Cost & Profit Motive (Prueba: Costo y Lucro):
3. Evidence: Black Carbon & No Planet B (Contaminación):
4. Robotic Superiority & Rover Success (Ventaja Robótica):
Synthesis
Comparative Verdict • Tu Veredicto
Use Frame Below
Which author presented more compelling reasons and evidence? Synthesize both arguments in 2–3 complete sentences:
Sentence Stem: "While Alarcón / Caffall makes a valid argument about ________, I find Alarcón / Caffall more convincing because ________."
Did you cite specific details (e.g., $1T cost, carrying capacity, rovers, asteroid ice) in your map?
Space Frontier Debate
Space Debate Exit Ticket Exit Ticket Boleto de Salida • Cierre
Space Debate Quick Check
Name:
Date: Period:
1. Alarcón's Core Reason Text 1 (p. 4)
Why does Alarcón claim humans must colonize Mars?
¿Por qué afirma que los humanos deben colonizar Marte?
A Space tourism will generate huge tax revenues for Earth. B Earth is exhausting its carrying capacity and natural resources. C Robots have failed to send clear scientific data from Mars.
2. Caffall's Core Warning Text 2 (p. 2)
What is Caffall's main critique of private commercial companies?
¿Cuál es su crítica hacia las empresas privadas?
A They build rockets that are too small to carry rover cameras. B They focus on profits and risk turning science into reality TV. C They refuse to test spacecraft landing systems on water.
3. Argument Synthesis • Tu Postura Constructed Response
Which author provided stronger evidence to defend their vision? Complete the frame and provide your reason:
Sentence Stem: "I believe Alarcón's / Caffall's argument is stronger because ________, whereas the other author ________."
How confident do you feel debating this topic?
High / Listo Medium / Más o menos Need Help / Necesito apoyo
Cut Here • Cortar Aquí
Exit Ticket Boleto de Salida • Cierre
Space Debate Quick Check
Name:
Date: Period:
1. Alarcón's Core Reason Text 1 (p. 4)
Why does Alarcón claim humans must colonize Mars?
¿Por qué afirma que los humanos deben colonizar Marte?
A Space tourism will generate huge tax revenues for Earth. B Earth is exhausting its carrying capacity and natural resources. C Robots have failed to send clear scientific data from Mars.
2. Caffall's Core Warning Text 2 (p. 2)
What is Caffall's main critique of private commercial companies?
¿Cuál es su crítica hacia las empresas privadas?
A They build rockets that are too small to carry rover cameras. B They focus on profits and risk turning science into reality TV. C They refuse to test spacecraft landing systems on water.
3. Argument Synthesis • Tu Postura Constructed Response
Which author provided stronger evidence to defend their vision? Complete the frame and provide your reason:
Sentence Stem: "I believe Alarcón's / Caffall's argument is stronger because ________, whereas the other author ________."
How confident do you feel debating this topic?
High / Listo Medium / Más o menos Need Help / Necesito apoyo
Space Debate Speaking Cards Debate Speaking Toolkit • Set 1 Tarjetas de Diálogo Académico
Space Debate Speaking Cards
Roles 1–4: Opening Claims & Introducing Text Evidence
Cut & Distribute
Use during Partner & Fishbowl Debates
Cut along dashed lines (Corta sobre las líneas punteadas para cada tarjeta)
Opening & Evidence
Card 1
Opening Claim: Team Pro-Human
Alarcón
Your Role / Tu Rol: State why humans must continue exploring and settling outer space.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"Our team argues that sending human crews into space is necessary. According to Claudia Alarcón, Earth is close to surpassing its carrying capacity, which means ________."
"Therefore, we must establish settlements on Mars because ________."
Apoyo en español: "Nuestro equipo sostiene que enviar astronautas es necesario porque la Tierra está sobrepasando su límite de recursos..."
Target Evidence: p. 4, ¶11 Speak with confidence!
Card 2
Opening Claim: Team Pro-Robot
Caffall
Your Role / Tu Rol: State why robotic exploration is safer, cheaper, and more sensible.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"Our team contends that space exploration should be done by robots, not humans. Eiren Caffall proves that human space travel costs over ________, money that should be used to ________."
"There is no 'Planet B', and robots are superior researchers because ________."
Apoyo en español: "Nuestro equipo sostiene que los robots deben explorar el espacio. Caffall demuestra que el viaje humano cuesta demasiado..."
Target Evidence: p. 1 & p. 2 Speak with confidence!
Card 3
Citing Evidence: Resources & Tech
Evidence
Your Role / Tu Rol: Provide concrete facts about space mining and energy benefits for Earth.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"To support our claim with text evidence, on page 3 Alarcón notes that mining asteroids can provide ________ for rocket fuel."
"In addition, mining the Moon for helium-3 and rare metals will directly benefit Earth by ________."
Apoyo en español: "Para apoyar nuestra tesis con evidencia del texto, en la página 3 Alarcón explica que la minería de asteroides provee combustible..."
Target Evidence: p. 3 (Asteroids & Moon) Cite page numbers!
Card 4
Citing Evidence: Health & Pollution
Evidence
Your Role / Tu Rol: Provide data showing radiation hazards and atmospheric black carbon soot.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"We have strong scientific evidence against sending humans. On page 3, Caffall cites data showing an astronaut would absorb deadly radiation that increases ________."
"Furthermore, rocket launches release black carbon soot that remains trapped for ________."
Apoyo en español: "Tenemos evidencia científica sólida. En la página 3, Caffall cita que la radiación daña gravemente la salud de los astronautas..."
Target Evidence: p. 2 & p. 3 Cite data and facts!
Space Frontier Debate • Academic Discourse Toolkit Page 1 of 2
Debate Speaking Toolkit • Set 2 Tarjetas de Diálogo Académico
Space Debate Speaking Cards
Roles 5–8: Rebuttals, Cross-Examination & Synthesis
Cut & Distribute
Respond, Question & Synthesize
Cut along dashed lines (Corta sobre las líneas punteadas)
Rebuttals & Synthesis
Card 5
Rebuttal: Challenge Human Flight
Counter
Your Role / Tu Rol: Politely challenge Team Pro-Human on risks, costs, or private commercialization.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"I respect your point about carrying capacity; however, how can you justify spending ________ when Earth's pollution needs urgent funding?"
"Furthermore, relying on private sponsors risks turning science into ________ instead of serious discovery."
Apoyo en español: "Respeto tu punto; sin embargo, ¿cómo justificas gastar un billón de dólares cuando la Tierra necesita fondos urgentes...?"
Target Focus: Caffall, p. 2 Be respectful and clear!
Card 6
Rebuttal: Challenge Robot Only
Counter
Your Role / Tu Rol: Politely challenge Team Pro-Robot on human creativity and long-term survival.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"While robots take great photos, Alarcón explains that robots alone cannot solve our long-term crisis because robots cannot ________."
"Direct human involvement is essential because human explorers can ________ in ways robots never can."
Apoyo en español: "Aunque los robots toman buenas fotos, los robots no pueden colonizar ni resolver la falta de espacio para los humanos..."
Target Focus: Alarcón, p. 2 & p. 4 Be respectful and clear!
Card 7
Cross-Examination: Ask for Evidence
Question
Your Role / Tu Rol: Ask the opposing speaker to clarify their claim with specific text proof.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"What specific evidence from the text supports your claim that ________?"
"How does your author address the opposing argument that ________?"
Apoyo en español: "¿Qué evidencia específica del texto apoya tu afirmación sobre...? ¿Cómo responde tu autor a la objeción sobre...?"
Target: Push for deeper facts Listen closely to their answer!
Card 8
Synthesis: Proposing a Compromise
Synthesis
Your Role / Tu Rol: Bridge both sides and propose a balanced partnership between humans and robots.
Say this aloud (Di esto):
"Both authors raise critical points. Perhaps the best solution is a partnership where robotic probes ________ to minimize risk, while human crews ________."
"This balanced approach protects human lives while still advancing ________."
Apoyo en español: "Ambos autores tienen puntos válidos. La mejor solución es una alianza donde los robots hagan... y los humanos hagan..."
Target: Final Synthesis Stance Unite both perspectives!
Space Frontier Debate • Academic Discourse Toolkit Page 2 of 2
Space Debate Pacing Guide 5-Day Unit Plan Plan de Pacing de 5 Días con Examen
Space Debate 5-Day Pacing Guide
Humans vs. Robots in Outer Space • 45–50 Minute Daily Instructional Blueprint
Grades 6–8 ELA
Includes Space Debate Quiz
Unit Essential Question: Should humanity invest in sending human astronauts or robotic probes to deep space?
10 Integrated Materials
Day 1
Text 1 Launch • Claudia Alarcón: Humans in Space
Focus: Claims & Resources
Daily Learning Objective: Students will identify Alarcón's central claim and annotate evidence regarding space mining and carrying capacity.
Materials Used: Slides 1–3, Flashcards Set 1 (Cards 1–6), Annotation Guide (Page 1).
Phase & Time Teacher & Student Actions Bilingual Scaffolding (Apoyo)
Hook (10m) Display Slide 1; introduce Essential Question; review Flashcards 1–3 (priority, colonization, at stake). Call out cognates: prioridad, colonización.
Direct (12m) Model Slide 2 annotation key (★, 🔍, ⚡, 💡); read aloud Targeted Passage ¶3 together. Clarify shuttle tragedies (Challenger/Columbia).
Guided (18m) Students read pp. 2–4; answer Q1 & Q2 on Guide Page 1 using scaffolded sentence stems. Provide Spanish translation prompt box for Q1/Q2.
Close (8m) Students complete Q3 (Mt. Everest analogy); quick partner check of annotations. Sentence starter: "Alarcón asserts Earth is..."
Day 2
Text 2 Counterargument • Eiren Caffall: Let Robots Take the Stars
Focus: Cost, Radiation & Exit Ticket
Daily Learning Objective: Students will analyze Caffall's counterarguments against private firms, $1T Mars cost, and complete the formative Exit Ticket.
Materials Used: Slide 4, Flashcards Set 2 (Cards 7–12), Annotation Guide (Page 2), Exit Ticket.
Phase & Time Teacher & Student Actions Bilingual Scaffolding (Apoyo)
Hook (8m) Display Slide 4; partner review of Flashcards 7–10 (private, profits, soot, radiation). Anchor difference between NASA and private firms.
Direct (10m) Teacher leads reading of Targeted Passage ¶3 (reality TV risk); model marking 💰 and ⚠️ symbols. Explain "reality TV" concept in Spanish.
Guided (18m) Students read pp. 2–4; complete Q1–Q3 on Guide Page 2 (black carbon soot & rover feats). Sentence starter: "Rocket emissions trap soot..."
Assess (12m) Administer half-page Exit Ticket as mid-point check; collect for formative review. Read aloud Spanish prompts on Exit Ticket.
Teacher Note: Check Answer Key (Pages 1 & 2) for model sentence stem completions. Page 1 of 2
Debate & Assessment Días 3, 4 y 5 • Debate, Redacción y Examen
5-Day Pacing Guide: Days 3, 4 & 5
Argument Mapping, Synthesis Writing, and Space Debate Quiz Administration
Culminating Assessment
Quiz Key Aligned
Day 3
Argument Mapping & Structured Debate
Oral Academic Discourse
Objective: Map claims onto Graphic Organizer; debate using Speaking Cards.
Materials: Graphic Organizer, Slides 5–6, Speaking Cards 1–8.
Phase & Time Teacher & Student Actions Bilingual Scaffolding (Apoyo)
Map (12m) Display Slide 5 (Argument Face-Off); students fill in dual-column Graphic Organizer. Allow reference to Guide pp. 1-2.
Prep (10m) Assign teams (Pro-Human vs. Pro-Robot); hand out Speaking Cards 1–8; rehearse frames. Students read Spanish support boxes first.
Debate (20m) Conduct Fishbowl / Partner Debate using Slide 6 frames (Cards 1-4 claims; Cards 5-8 rebuttals). Enforce sentence starter use while speaking.
Close (6m) Debrief: Which evidence was most persuasive? Complete bottom verdict on map. Preview synthesis prompt for Day 4.
Day 4
Comparative Synthesis Writing & Peer Check
Evaluative Writing
Objective: Write evaluative synthesis response defending personal stance with evidence.
Materials: Slide 7, Annotation Guide (Page 3), Teacher Rubric (Key Page 3).
Phase & Time Teacher & Student Actions Bilingual Scaffolding (Apoyo)
Model (8m) Project Slide 7; model 3 tiered stance options (A: Pro-Human, B: Pro-Robot, C: Compromise). Clarify criteria: must cite both authors!
Write (24m) Independent writing on Annotation Guide Page 3; teacher conferences with students. Encourage Spanish speakers to use stems A, B, or C.
Review (10m) Peer review using Page 3 Student Checklist (Clear Claim, Both Texts, Sentence Stem). Partners verify two facts are cited.
Wrap (6m) Final revisions; remind students that Day 5 is the Space Debate Quiz! Take-home Flashcards for study.
Day 5
Assessment Day • Space Debate Quiz & Reflection
20-Point Reading Quiz
Objective: Demonstrate mastery of vocabulary, text evidence, and argument synthesis on the Quiz.
Materials: Space Debate Quiz (2 pages), Space Quiz Answer Key.
Phase & Time Teacher & Student Actions Bilingual Scaffolding (Apoyo)
Warm-Up (8m) Quick 5-minute flashcard speed match; clarify test instructions and point values. Review test Spanish subtitles.
Quiz (26m) Students independently complete Quiz (Parts 1–5: Vocab, Text 1, Text 2, Comparison, Written). Allow ELLs to use pre-printed sentence frame on Q9.
Review (10m) Collect quizzes; review Questions 1–8 using Quiz Answer Key; discuss key takeaways. Celebrate vocabulary growth!
Reflect (4m) Final class vote: Has anyone changed their mind on human vs. robotic space flight? Grade Q9 using Quiz Key models.
Quiz Differentiation Accommodations:
Emerging ELLs: May reference Flashcards during Quiz Part 1; accept Question 9 responses that clearly complete the provided sentence starter with at least one text citation. Expanding/Bridging: Require two distinct pieces of evidence comparing both texts on Question 9.
Space Frontier Debate • Complete 5-Day Pacing Guide with Quiz Integration Page 2 of 2
Space Debate Quiz Reading Quiz Prueba de Lectura • Preguntas Claras
Space Frontier Debate Quiz
Humans Need Outer Space vs. Let Robots Take to the Stars
Name:
Date: Period:
Directions: Read each question and choose the best answer. (Elige la mejor respuesta). Total: 20 Points
Part 1: Vocabulary Words (2 pts each) Palabras Clave
1. What does priority mean?
¿Qué significa prioridad?
A Something of top importance B An unexpected accident C A low-cost journey
2. What does at stake mean?
¿Qué significa en juego?
A Completely safe and protected B In danger of being lost C Easy to accomplish
3. What does profits mean?
¿Qué significa ganancias?
A Money that a business makes B Government taxes paid C Science books and tools
Part 2: Text 1 • Humans Need Outer Space (3 pts each)
Alarcón's Reasons
4. Why does Alarcón say humans must take the risk to go to Mars?
¿Por qué dice la autora que los humanos deben arriesgarse a ir a Marte?
A Private companies have already built completely safe rocket landings on water. B Earth is running out of natural resources and room for its growing population. C Tourists want to visit space hotels rather than staying on Earth.
5. According to page 3, how can mining on the Moon and asteroids help people?
¿Cómo ayuda a las personas la minería en asteroides y en la Luna?
A Asteroid ice makes cheaper rocket fuel, and Moon minerals give clean energy to Earth. B Moon rocks can be used to stop all rocket crashes on Earth. C Mining asteroid ice replaces the need to build any more solar panels.
Turn page for Text 2 questions and the short written response Page 1 of 2
Part 3 & 4
Text 2 Analysis & Comparison
Name:
Part 3: Text 2 • Let Robots Take to the Stars (3 pts each)
Caffall's Reasons
6. What evidence does Caffall give on pages 2–3 to show that rockets harm Earth?
¿Qué prueba da la autora para mostrar que los cohetes dañan la Tierra?
A Rocket noise scares ocean animals away from beaches. B Rocket smoke leaves black soot that stays in the air for up to ten years. C Rocket launches cause earthquakes near landing sites.
7. Why does Caffall think robot rovers are better than human astronauts?
¿Por qué cree Caffall que los robots exploran mejor que los humanos?
A Robots explore cheaply without needing food, air, or fearing deadly space radiation. B Robots can build houses and grow vegetable farms on Mars. C Robots can return to Earth in less than twenty-four hours.
Part 4: Comparing Both Texts (3 pts) Differences
8. How are Alarcón's and Caffall's opinions about private space companies different?
¿En qué se diferencian las opiniones de ambas autoras sobre las empresas privadas?
A Alarcón thinks private firms bring new ideas, but Caffall worries they care only about profits. B Alarcón wants to stop all private rockets, while Caffall wants private rockets to replace NASA. C Both authors agree that private companies should only build telescopes.
Part 5: Written Response (5 pts) Use Sentence Stem
Which author gives better reasons: Claudia Alarcón (send humans) or Eiren Caffall (send robots)? State your opinion and give two facts from the texts:
Apoyo en español: ¿Qué autora da mejores razones? Da tu opinión y escribe dos datos del texto.
Sentence Stem: "I think Alarcón / Caffall gives a better argument because ________. One fact from the text is that ________. Also, ________."
Score Breakdown: Vocab: ___ / 6 Text 1: ___ / 6 Text 2: ___ / 3 Comparison: ___ / 3 Written: ___ / 5
Total: ___ / 20
Space Quiz Answer Key Teacher Key Clave del Maestro • Guía de Calificación
Space Debate Quiz Answer Key
Fast-Grading Guide & Text Evidence Rationales • Total: 20 Points
Quick Score Sheet
Aligned to Space Debate Quiz
At-a-Glance Key:
1: A 2: B 3: A 4: B 5: A 6: B 7: A 8: A
Q9 = Written (5 pts)
Part 1 & 2 Rationales • Vocabulary & Text 1 12 Points Total
1. (A) Top importance
Text p. 2: Glossary defines priority as "importance"; presidential administrations gave importance to private firms.
2. (B) In danger of being lost
Text p. 4: Glossary defines at stake as "at risk, or in danger". Earth's natural resources are in danger.
3. (A) Money that a business makes
Text p. 2: Glossary defines profits as "the money a business makes", contrasting with practical science.
4. (B) Earth running out of resources & space
Text p. 4, ¶11: Author explicitly states Earth is "surpassing our planet's carrying capacity and exhausting resources."
5. (A) Asteroid ice = rocket fuel; Moon minerals = clean energy on Earth
Text p. 3: Asteroid ice converted to rocket fuel enables deep missions; Helium-3 on the Moon develops energy on Earth.
Part 3 & 4 Rationales • Text 2 & Comparison 6 Points Total
6. (B) Black soot in air
Text p. 2: Soot sits above the atmosphere for up to 10 years without rain or wind to wash it away.
7. (A) Robots explore cheaply
Text pp. 3–4: Robots do not get cancer from radiation, run out of food, or require $1T life-support systems.
8. (A) Differing views on firms
Cross-Text: Alarcón supports "New Space" innovation, while Caffall criticizes profit-driven dreamers.
Part 5: Written Response Scoring Rubric (5 Points Total) 1 pt Claim • 2 pts Text 1 Evidence • 2 pts Text 2 Evidence
Exemplar A: Pro-Alarcón (Full 5/5):
"I think Alarcón gives a better argument because Earth cannot sustain our population forever. One fact from the text is that Earth is exhausting its carrying capacity and natural resources (p. 4). Also, mining asteroid ice can provide cheap rocket fuel to explore further (p. 3)."
Exemplar B: Pro-Caffall (Full 5/5):
"I think Caffall gives a better argument because sending humans is too dangerous and expensive. One fact from the text is that a trip to Mars costs $1 trillion over 25 years (p. 1). Also, space radiation increases cancer risk, while rovers like Curiosity explore safely (p. 3)."
ELL Scoring Tip: Award full points on Question 9 if students communicate an accurate claim and two factual details, even with minor spelling or grammar errors.
Class Target: 16+ / 20
Space Frontier Debate • Teacher Quiz Key & Assessment Reference Page 1 of 1
Space Debate Policy Brief Honors & Advanced Inquiry Análisis Retórico y Ético • Nivel Avanzado
Space Policy Advisory Brief
Congressional Science Committee Simulation • Alarcón vs. Caffall
Advisor:
Date: Period:
Your Scenario: You are the Chief Science Policy Advisor to Congress evaluating whether to fund human Mars missions or deep-space robotic networks.
Policy Document
Part 1: Rhetorical Strategy & Persuasive Appeals
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in Both Arguments
Claudia Alarcón (Pro-Humans) Techno-Optimism
Pathos & Human Spirit:
Compares Mars to Mount Everest (p. 4)—appeals to human courage and historic ambition rather than pure caution.
Logos & Existential Necessity:
Cites carrying capacity and resource exhaustion—argues colonization is an ecological necessity, not a luxury.
Critical Question: Does her Mount Everest analogy downplay the loss of human life in the Challenger and Columbia shuttle disasters?
Eiren Caffall (Pro-Robots) Practical Realism
Ethos & Scientific Integrity:
Critiques commercial "reality TV" sponsorship—warns profit motives erode objective scientific standards (p. 2).
Logos & Environmental Reality:
Calculates $1 trillion cost and 10-year soot persistence—proves space flight worsens climate instability on Earth.
Critical Question: Does her focus on immediate Earth costs ignore the potential long-term returns of off-planet space mining?
Part 2: Ethical Dilemma Inquiries
Choose One to Analyze Below
Dilemma A: The "Planet B" Moral Hazard
Caffall warns that planning to settle Mars creates a "Planet B" illusion where society feels permission to exploit Earth's remaining resources. Does human colonization decrease our commitment to climate stewardship?
Dilemma B: Commercialization vs. Public Good
Alarcón champions private companies, but Caffall warns of commercial reality TV. Should billionaires and private firms control planetary exploration, or must space exploration remain strictly public and nonprofit?
Your Ethical Analysis (Analyze Dilemma A or B in 2 complete sentences):
Advanced Rhetorical Discourse Frames / Marcos Retóricos:
"While Alarcón effectively employs logos regarding carrying capacity, she concedes little to ________."
"Caffall's critique of private commercialization is compelling; nevertheless, it overlooks ________."
Proceed to Page 2 for the Federal Budget Simulation & Policy Recommendation Memo Page 1 of 2
Part 3 & 4
10-Year NASA Federal Budget Allocation & Advisory Memo
Advisor:
Part 3: The 10-Year $250 Billion Space Budget Allocation
Must equal 100% / $250 Billion Total
As Congressional Advisor, divide the $250 Billion 10-year NASA budget across four programs based on evidence from Alarcón and Caffall:
Program Category Your % Amount ($B) Text Evidence Justification
1. Human Moon/Mars Missions (Alarcón) Carrying capacity, Mt. Everest challenge
2. Robotic Probes & Rovers (Caffall) Hubble, Curiosity rovers, zero radiation risk
3. Earth Climate & Pollution Monitoring (Caffall) Clean energy, soot research, healing Earth first
4. Private Commercial Innovation (Alarcón) Space mining, asteroid ice fuel, New Space
Part 4: Executive Policy Recommendation Memo
Formal Advisory Task
Write an executive policy memo to the Congressional Committee explaining your recommended strategy. You must synthesize points from both authors, refute one major counterargument, and defend your budget allocation:
Strategic Frame: "I advise Congress to prioritize ________ because the empirical evidence demonstrating ________ outweighs the alternative."
Rebuttal Frame: "Although opponents will cite Alarcón / Caffall regarding ________, this risk is mitigated by ________."
Evaluation Rubric: [ ] Nuanced Dual-Text Synthesis [ ] Balanced $250B Budget Total [ ] Explicit Refutation of Counterargument [ ] Executive Academic Tone
Advanced Standard
Space Frontier Debate • Honors & Advanced Inquiry Policy Brief Page 2 of 2
Space Debate Newcomer Guide Newcomer & WIDA Level 1–2 Guía Visual Bilingüe • Inglés y Español
Space Debate Newcomer Guide
Visual Summaries, Word Banks, and Sentence Frames
Name:
Date: Period:
Read the pictures, words, and Spanish notes to understand the debate! (¡Usa los dibujos y notas!) Set 1
1. Visual Word Bank • Banco de Palabras Match words with pictures
Astronaut (Astronauta)
Robot / Rover (Robot explorador)
Earth (Tierra)
Mars (Marte)
Text 1: Claudia Alarcón • Humans Need Outer Space
Pro-Humans
What the Author Says (In English):
• Claudia Alarcón says humans must explore space .
Lo que dice la autora (En Español):
• Claudia Alarcón dice que los humanos deben viajar al espacio .
Check Your Understanding • Comprueba tu Lectura
Does Alarcón want humans to travel to Mars? (¿Alarcón quiere enviar humanos a Marte?)
YES (Sí) NO (No)
Complete the Sentence • Completa la Oración Use the Word Bank
Mars (Marte) resources (recursos) humans (humanos)
1. Claudia Alarcón wants to send ________ to outer space.
2. Humans need to build a new colony on the planet ________.
3. Colonizing space is important because Earth is running out of natural ________.
Turn to Page 2 for Text 2 and your Debate Choice! Page 1 of 2
Part 2
Text 2 & Your Debate Stance • Tu Opinión
Name:
Text 2: Eiren Caffall • Let Robots Take to the Stars
Pro-Robots
What the Author Says (In English):
• Eiren Caffall says robots should explore space, not humans .
Lo que dice la autora (En Español):
• Eiren Caffall dice que los robots deben explorar, no los humanos .
Check Your Understanding • Comprueba tu Lectura
Does Caffall think sending humans to Mars is too expensive? (¿Caffall cree que es muy costoso?)
YES (Sí) NO (No)
Complete the Sentence • Completa la Oración Use the Word Bank
robots (robots) radiation (radiación) Earth (Tierra)
1. Eiren Caffall believes space should be explored by ________.
2. Space travel is dangerous for astronauts because of deadly ________.
3. Instead of looking for "Planet B", Caffall says we must protect our home, ________.
My Debate Stance • Mi Veredicto Choose Your Side
Team Humans (Claudia Alarcón) Send astronauts to build colonies!
Team Robots (Eiren Caffall) Send robot rovers to stay safe!
Write Your Reason (Escribe tu razón con el marco):
"I agree with Alarcón / Caffall because ________."
Great job! Share your opinion with your teacher or partner.
Page 2 of 2
