LESSON 6: Roof Truss Comparison (4.MD.C.5)

Sample Proof: Chris's claim is mathematically incorrect. The angle at the peak of a truss is determined by the amount of rotation between the two slanted roof boards, not by the linear width of the base. For example, a truss can have a very wide base, but if the slanted sides are extremely long, the peak angle will be acute (sharp and narrow). Conversely, a truss with a short base can have a very obtuse (wide) peak angle if the height is short. Peak angle size must be compared by direct rotation.

LESSON 7: Radar Scan Sweep (4.MD.C.5.a)

Sample Proof: Owen's calculation contains a systematic error because he assumed the hour hand remains fixed at 3 during the half-hour. In 30 minutes, the minute hand moves to the 6 (180°), but the hour hand moves exactly halfway between the 3 and the 4. Since each hour number on a clock represents 30° (360° / 12), the hour hand has moved 15° past the 3. The actual angle between the hands at 3:30 is 75° (the distance from 6 to halfway-to-4), which is less than 90°.

LESSON 8: Wind Turbine Rotations (4.MD.C.5.a)

Sample Proof: Tina is incorrect. While a static circle contains 360 degrees of unique coordinate boundary, a dynamic rotation can accumulate infinitely. A 450-degree rotation represents one full rotation (360 degrees) plus an additional 90 degrees of a second rotation (450° - 360° = 90°). Physically, the turbine blade makes 1 and 1/4 total turns, ending up perpendicular to its starting horizontal baseline.

ANGLE ARCHITECTS TEACHER RESOURCE Page 18

TEACHER'S SOLUTIONS MANUAL

Angle Architects Master Key

SECTION B & C: LESSONS 9-12

LESSON 9: Suspension Bridge Cables (4.MD.C.6)

Sample Proof: Ira made a classic scale interpretation error. Because the cable rises sharply, it forms an acute angle (less than 90°). Ira read the inner scale of the protractor (which read 140°) instead of the outer scale which aligned with 0° on the right side. Since the two scales on a protractor are supplementary (adding up to 180°), the actual angle of the cable is 40 degrees (180° - 140° = 40°). This matches the visual acute profile.

LESSON 10: Structural Integrity (4.G.A.1)

Sample Proof: Bill's claim is highly dangerous in skyscraper construction. While a 1-degree lean seems minor at the base, as the steel column rises 100 feet (1,200 inches) high, that 1-degree tilt will cause the top of the column to lean nearly 21 inches off-center. This shifts the skyscraper's center of gravity outside the core foundation base, introducing immense shear stress on the joints and leading to structural failure. Perpendicular lines (exactly 90°) are mathematically required to transfer vertical load straight down.

LESSON 11: Flight Navigation Paths (4.MD.C.6)

Sample Proof: Penny can easily solve this. Since a straight line is 180 degrees, she can express the 210-degree reflex angle as a sum of a straight line and a small acute angle: 210° = 180° + 30°. Penny should draw a straight line segment, place the protractor center on the point, and mark a reference line at 180°. She should then flip the protractor upside down and measure an additional 30 degrees clockwise from the line to achieve a perfect 210-degree heading.

LESSON 12: Origami Art Angles (4.G.A.1)

Sample Proof: Ava's claim is false because she used the word "always". To disprove it, we provide counter-examples: (1) Combining a 10° acute angle and a 20° acute angle yields a 30° angle, which is still acute. (2) Combining a 45° acute angle and a 45° acute angle yields exactly 90°, which is a right angle. (3) Combining 60° and 50° yields 110°, which is obtuse. Because the sum can be acute, right, or obtuse depending on the values, Ava's universal claim is mathematically disproven.

ANGLE ARCHITECTS TEACHER RESOURCE Page 19

TEACHER'S SOLUTIONS MANUAL

Angle Architects Master Key

SECTION C: LESSONS 13-16

LESSON 13: Shipping Lane Courses (4.MD.C.7)

Sample Proof: Captain Carl is mathematically incorrect. Angles are defined as a measure of rotation, and rotations are additive when in the same plane and sharing a vertex and ray. If adjacent Angle 1 (45°) and Angle 2 (55°) share a ray without overlapping, they partition the total rotation. The total combined angle is exactly equal to the sum of its parts: 45° + 55° = 100°. The laws of Euclidean geometry guarantee that these values remain constant and additive.

LESSON 14: Clock Mechanisms (4.MD.C.7)

Sample Proof: Gabe's calculation is perfectly correct. We can set up a proportion: 20 minutes out of 60 minutes represents exactly 20/60 = 1/3 of a full hour. Since the minute hand travels a full circle (360 degrees) in one hour, we multiply the fraction 1/3 by the total degrees in a circle: 1/3 * 360° = 120°. Therefore, the minute hand turns exactly 120 degrees, proving Gabe's gear ratios are correctly aligned.

LESSON 15: Cable-Stayed Bridges (4.MD.C.7)

Sample Proof: Eric's claim is incorrect. While the straight deck measures 180 degrees, and the middle vertical cable is 90 degrees, the other two outside angles (Angle X and Angle Z) must simply add up to 90 degrees (180° - 90° = 90°). They do not have to be equal. For example, Angle X could be 30° and Angle Z could be 60°. This still forms a perfect 180-degree layout on the bridge deck. Eric's equal-angle assumption is a severe constraint that is not geometrically required.

LESSON 16: Wheelchair Access Ramps (4.MD.C.5)

Sample Proof: Cody is incorrect. In a right triangle with a fixed vertical height, the relationship between the angle of incline and the horizontal run is non-linear (trigonometric). While doubling the angle of a very shallow slope (like 1° to 2°) comes close to cutting the run in half, as the angles grow larger, the ratio fails completely. For example, a 45-degree angle has a run equal to the height (ratio 1:1). Doubling that angle to 90 degrees does not cut the run in half; it creates an infinite slope (vertical wall) where the horizontal run is zero.

ANGLE ARCHITECTS TEACHER RESOURCE Page 20