Session 2 Peer Interviews

Students engage in a 'shadowing' technique, repeating audio immediately after hearing it to internalize the rhythm and flow of connected speech. This active processing reinforces their ability to predict and process sound streams.

A high-stakes simulated networking mixer where students must apply their knowledge of idioms, phrasal verbs, and social listening to complete specific "missions."

Focusing on function words, this lesson tackles common reductions like 'gonna,' 'wanna,' and weak forms of auxiliary verbs. Students analyze unscripted interviews to catch these reductions in context.

Focuses on the structural and social aspects of casual professional conversations, emphasizing the role of fillers, backchanneling, and small talk in building rapport.

Students analyze how speakers use shorthand references to history, pop culture, and sports to convey complex ideas, and develop strategies for asking for clarification when references are missed.

Students learn how sounds influence their neighbors (e.g., 'hand bag' becoming 'hambag'). The lesson uses minimal pair discrimination and dictation exercises to train ears to recognize words despite phonological changes.

Students participate in a university-style mini-lecture simulation. They apply all learned strategies—signpost identification, Cornell note-taking, and synthesis—to capture information and complete a formal assessment.

Focuses on the transition from formal to informal spoken English by identifying and decoding phrasal verbs in narrative segments.

This lesson covers the phenomenon of elision, where sounds (particularly /t/ and /d/) disappear in rapid speech. Students practice listening to high-speed dialogues to identify words that have been 'swallowed' by the speaker.

Learners practice reconstructing audio messages in their own words, focusing on paraphrasing rather than direct quotation. Peer evaluation ensures accuracy and comprehension through a synthesis-based workshop.

In this culminating lesson, students listen to two contrasting viewpoints on a single global issue. They must synthesize the information to answer a prompt, citing specific details from both audio sources to support their conclusion.

Students encounter high-frequency idioms used in professional settings through context-rich audio simulations, moving beyond rote memorization to contextual inference.

Deconstructs persuasive speech to identify rhetorical strategies, tonal journeys, and the use of strategic pauses for emotional impact.

Examines how speakers adjust their register and tone based on audience and context, focusing on professional vs. informal markers.

Explores how shifting stress within a single sentence radically alters its implied meaning and subtext.

Focuses on identifying bias and subjectivity in media and speeches by analyzing word choice, emotional tone, and selective emphasis.

Students analyze the acoustic cues of irony and sarcasm—such as pitch, length, and intonation—to distinguish between literal and intended meaning in spoken English.

Students finalize their research synthesis into a report or presentation and participate in a peer-review gallery walk.

This lesson focuses on academic transitions like 'however' and 'furthermore' to link ideas smoothly, featuring a 'Transition Maze' game.

Students draft a body paragraph that combines information from multiple sources using the 'Topic Sentence - Evidence - Explanation' structure and sentence frames.

A culminating simulation where students alternate between active participation and observational analysis using the fishbowl method. Focuses on applying all previously learned listening skills.

Learners compare two short articles on the same topic to find areas of agreement and disagreement, using Venn diagrams to visualize source overlap.

Students learn to categorize scattered facts using graphic organizers like matrix charts. They practice sorting a 'junk drawer' of information into logical sub-topics to prepare for academic writing.

Focuses on the cognitive load of tracking multiple speakers in a fast-paced environment. Students practice mapping argument threads and identifying alliances in group discourse.

Students identify the rhetorical structures used to agree and disagree in intellectual debates. The lesson focuses on 'yes, but' constructions and nuanced consensus building.

An analysis of the verbal and non-verbal cues used to manage floor control in academic discussions. Students learn to predict and identify transitions between speakers.

A culminating simulation where students apply all strategies during a mock academic lecture assessment.

Students explore how academic speakers use hedging language to soften assertions and maintain professional relationships. Activities focus on distinguishing between literal meaning and pragmatic intent.

Students practice synthesizing auditory information into concise, logical summaries and paraphrasing key points.

Introduction to shorthand, symbols, and the Cornell note-taking method for capturing information in real-time.

Focuses on distinguishing core academic arguments from anecdotes and digressions using linguistic and vocal cues.

Students learn to identify macro-markers and signposting language that signal organizational structure in academic lectures.

The capstone lesson where students apply all previous skills to summarize a rapid-fire seminar discussion with accurate attribution and key takeaways.

An exploration of how cultural backgrounds influence communication styles, focusing on silence, interruption, and pragmatic markers.

Focuses on detecting bias and underlying agendas in panel discussions by cross-referencing speaker statements and identifying stakeholder perspectives.

Students analyze tone in high-stakes social interactions, identifying markers of escalation, de-escalation, and negotiation in conflict scenarios.

Students trace the evolution of an argument through chains of agreement, disagreement, and concession to identify how a group reaches consensus.

Students learn to identify hedging language (e.g., 'somewhat', 'it appears') to gauge a speaker's confidence and distinguish between facts and cautious opinions.

An exploration of the verbal and non-verbal signals used to manage turn-taking, interruptions, and overlapping speech in dynamic conversations.

This lesson focuses on identifying sarcasm and irony through prosody, pitch, and context clues, helping students avoid literal misinterpretations.

Students learn to identify different speakers by voice characteristics and track their primary stances in a group discussion using visual mapping tools.

Students investigate how words flow together in natural speech, specifically focusing on consonant-vowel linking and intrusive sounds (/r/, /w/, /j/). They analyze audio samples to 'unstick' connected words.

Students explore the difference between what is said and what is meant by analyzing indirect speech acts and politeness strategies in everyday scenarios.

Students synthesize a full mini-lecture into a coherent summary, identifying stance and major takeaways.

A workshop on the Cornell, Outline, and Mapping methods, emphasizing shorthand and relationship visualization.

This lesson trains students to identify tonal shifts and linguistic markers that signal tangents or personal asides.

Learners differentiate between core arguments and supporting examples using vocal cues and structural patterns.

Students analyze signposting language to predict content and map the structural flow of academic talks.

Students analyze academic discourse to distinguish core arguments from supporting details. They practice 'pruning' irrelevant information and identifying essential evidence using a 'Podcast Editor' scenario.

Using their notes from previous lessons, students practice reconstructing the main argument of an auditory text. They work in pairs to verbally summarize a lecture segment to a partner who has not heard it, checking for accuracy and completeness.